Search for: "Paulson v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 77
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2010, 12:07 pm
If ACA knew Paulson was bearish, that “could bolster Goldman’s defense that nobody was misled here,” said Peter Henning, a law professor at Wayne State University. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 8:00 am
” Emphasizing its transaction fee of only $15 million, Goldman stated it lost more than $90 million on ABACUS 2007-AC1. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:11 pm
See Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 8:00 am
See Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Moreover, as a savvy investor, Paulson only wanted to bet against the securities with the greatest risk of default, those full of: borrowers with low credit scores, variable mortgages, and mortgages issued in states already beginning to suffer the worst of the housing crisis. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 5:22 am
“This isn’t mom and pop getting taken advantage of,” said Peter Henning, a professor at Wayne State University Law School in Detroit and a former SEC enforcement lawyer. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:59 am
SEC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
But that didn't work out, because Paulson couldn't arrive at price for assets that are still impossible to gauge, and losing value every day. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 6:32 am
There's already a shareholder derivative action pending in the North Carolina Business Court over the Bank of America/Merrill Lynch merger, Cunniff v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
What we're doing here is the start, not the end, of relevant research.Also, if you think we didn't get your state right, please let us know. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 9:59 pm
V. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 12:32 am
Chung highlights Justice Field's dissent in Juilliard v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:03 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
Frankly, such an agreement — e.g., Wells Fargo agreeing with Citigroup not to acquire Wachovia — would likely invite an antitrust inquiry, not to mention a very upset Hank Paulson asking why they're trying to deep freeze an already frozen market. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 2:05 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court said this in Doe v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
To the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate: As economists, we want to express to Congress our great concern for the plan proposed by Treasury Secretary Paulson to deal with the financial crisis. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 4:36 am
Good news if you have stock in the United States - boy can that country buy low. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:59 pm
The United States Supreme Court seems to otherwise have tried to put the calamity of Bush v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:58 pm
Paulson. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:28 am
However, the publicity about the lawsuit brought by the American Council of the Blind against the Department of the Treasury relating to currency design, American Council of the Blind v. [read post]
