Search for: "Peabody v. Time Warner Cable, Inc."
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2014, 8:24 pm
Time Warner Cable, Inc., No. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:23 pm
Time Warner Cable Inc., issued a decision interpreting the first prong of the test: the compensation requirement. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 6:42 am
The plaintiff in the case, Susan Peabody, worked approximately 45 hours per week as a commissioned salesperson for Time Warner Cable. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:37 am
Time Warner Cable, Inc. that a commission payment may be applied only to the pay period in which it is paid for the purposes of determining whether an employee is exempt from overtime. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 10:21 am
Time Warner Cable, Inc., where the timing of commission payments came under attack. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 6:42 am
The plaintiff in the case, Susan Peabody, worked approximately 45 hours per week as a commissioned salesperson for Time Warner Cable. [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 4:34 pm
Time Warner Cable, Inc. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 10:23 am
Time Warner Cable, Inc. that employees qualify for the California “commissioned employee” exemption in a pay period only if they receive “earnings [that] exceed one and one-half (1-1/2) times the minimum wage” in that two-week pay period. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 2:37 pm
Time Warner Cable, Inc. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm
Time Warner Cable, Inc. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 10:00 am
Time Warner Cable, Inc., the subject of a future blog post. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
Time Warner Cable Inc. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
See, e.g., Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
