Search for: "Pearl Assurance Company, Limited v. the United States"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2023, 1:18 pm
” United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
The residuary power of states is also limited (Art.I §10). [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:00 am
United States, however, based on a plain-language approach to the statutory phrase “no person. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
In March 2008, the JIDDU/SITTU Trust of Colchester, Vt. and CRC Excavating, LLC of Middlesex, Vt. demolished buildings on two residential lots in Essex Junction, Vt. at 231 and 235 Pearl Street, as part of a commercial project to build a three-story, 35-unit apartment building on the combined lot. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Dazzled by what software makes possible—the highs—we have embedded into our lives a technological medium capable of bringing society to its knees, but from which we demand virtually no quality assurance. [read post]
