Search for: "Pedraza v. Lee*"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2015, 3:42 pm
Pedraza-Fariña's description of the Federal Circuit as formalist and non-deferential certainly reflects a large body of scholarship (see, e.g., John Thomas (2003), Arti Rai (2003), Tim Holbrook (2003), Craig Nard (1995), and much of the briefing in Teva v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:32 am
Pedraza, 466 F.3d 932, 933 (10th Cir.2006) ( citing Spitznas v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:43 pm
CLOSEST RACE IS JUDGE PANDO V. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
(This is copyright, not patent, so I'll note it again tomorrow, but the rest of the panel is more patent-focused.)Lucas Osborn – 3D printing raises IP issues.Randy Picker – Reviews computer competition and innovation over last 100 years, including how WWII government contracting decisions shaped the computer patent environment.Michael Risch – 19th century apple-parer patents are instructive, including in showing how patent enforcement can channel innovation… [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 2:16 pm
But you can overstate the degree of what’s learned v. social. [read post]
