Search for: "Pelaez v. Ins*"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2021, 7:44 am
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal’s opinion in Pelaez v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 11:55 pm
The Appellate Division reverse the lower court’s ruling.The Appellate Division said that the City had demonstrated its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing, among other things, that it could not be subjected to tort liability for its decision to require sanitation workers to place cardboard and paper recyclables into the smaller compartment, as that decision constituted a discretionary act involving the exercise of reasoned judgment, citing Pelaez… [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 4:10 am
The Appellate Division reverse the lower court's ruling.The Appellate Division said that the City had demonstrated its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing, among other things, that it could not be subjected to tort liability for its decision to require sanitation workers to place cardboard and paper recyclables into the smaller compartment, as that decision constituted a discretionary act involving the exercise of reasoned judgment, citing Pelaez… [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm
Moreover, citing Pelaez v Seide, the City alleges that the governmental functions undertaken by its DOH in its investigation, inspection, monitoring and abatement of the lead-paint hazard at 22 Winter Avenue, constituted discretionary actions for which the municipality may not be subjected to liability even if negligently performed. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:33 pm
Pelaez, Pennsylvania’s Offset Rule: Fantasy Masquerading as Economics, 5 J. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:03 pm
[v]. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:33 pm
Pelaez, Pennsylvania’s Offset Rule: Fantasy Masquerading as Economics, 5 J. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:06 pm
Pelaez, Pennsylvania’s Offset Rule: Fantasy Masquerading as Economics, 5 J. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 6:01 pm
A U.S. federal court had occasion to address the subject of implied copyright licenses in the case of Pelaez v. [read post]
