Search for: "Pelzer v Transel El. & Elec. Inc."
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2009, 7:50 am
Nevertheless, the Court refused to allow the doctrine to be asserted by simply stating:Extensive and unrestricted application of the doctrine of primary assumption of risk to tort cases generally represents a throwback to the former doctrine of contributory negligence, wherein a plaintiff's own negligence barred recovery from the defendant (quoting Pelzer v Transel El. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 7:50 am
Nevertheless, the Court refused to allow the doctrine to be asserted by simply stating:Extensive and unrestricted application of the doctrine of primary assumption of risk to tort cases generally represents a throwback to the former doctrine of contributory negligence, wherein a plaintiff's own negligence barred recovery from the defendant (quoting Pelzer v Transel El. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 7:50 am
Nevertheless, the Court refused to allow the doctrine to be asserted by simply stating:Extensive and unrestricted application of the doctrine of primary assumption of risk to tort cases generally represents a throwback to the former doctrine of contributory negligence, wherein a plaintiff's own negligence barred recovery from the defendant (quoting Pelzer v Transel El. [read post]
