Search for: "Penn Central Company, Appeal of"
Results 1 - 20
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2008, 10:02 am
Against this backdrop, the holdings of this Court in Penn Central Transportation Company v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
The question before the Supreme Court is whether, in a regulatory taking case, the “parcel as a whole” concept as described in Penn Central Transportation Company v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:18 pm
That and the same court's blight precedents bode ill for a recently filed lawsuit (also noted in the Times article) challenging the legality of the Penn Central blight designation. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:50 am
The question before the United States Supreme Court was whether, in a regulatory taking case, the “parcel as a whole” concept as described in Penn Central Transportation Company v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:28 am
In 1978, Brennan wrote for a 6-3 majority in the Penn Central v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 12:18 pm
In that case, the Court will apply the factors set forth in Penn Central. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 7:39 am
In Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:36 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> NRDC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 10:42 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that a regulation restricting the sale of eggs was not a taking under Penn Central Transp. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 7:51 pm
In addition to being Chairman of the Marketing Department, he also wrote the text book on marketing and was a consultant to major fortune 500 companies. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992); and (2) whether, in light of the economic impact of the regulation on the claimant and on investment-backed expectations, a compensable taking has occurred under the alternative “ad hoc, factual inquiry” in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 4:35 pm
It may be appealed, possibly adding years to the final determination. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:53 pm
Today, in Interstate Companies, Inc v. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 4:35 pm
It may be appealed, possibly adding years to the final determination. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:18 pm
We hold that Scheehle's constitutional challenge to the Appointment System is properly considered under the regulatory takings test set forth in Penn Central Transportation Company v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 6:23 am
” Also, while they contended that the defendant ran a “centralized internship program based in Penn Plaza,” the interns offered no evidence to support that claim. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
” A 2-1 panel of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
” A 2-1 panel of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Applying the Penn Central factors, the Court concluded that the jury could not reasonably find for the plaintiff. [read post]
