Search for: "Penn Central Transportation Company v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2017, 8:50 am by The Federalist Society
The question before the United States Supreme Court was whether, in a regulatory taking case, the “parcel as a whole” concept as described in Penn Central Transportation Company v. [read post]
Because it found that the regulation was not a categorical taking, the district court found that it was subject to the Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 9:18 pm
We hold that Scheehle's constitutional challenge to the Appointment System is properly considered under the regulatory takings test set forth in Penn Central Transportation Company v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am by John Elwood
This case asks whether two legally distinct but commonly owned contiguous parcels can be combined for regulatory takings analysis under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:21 am by Bexis
  While we continue to await the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
The apex of this European flirtation with robust SOE driven economies occurred through the 1970s[22] with substantially different approaches to “socialism” and state management of economic activities across democratic Europe, in contradistinction to the central planning economies of the Soviet Union with a negligible private sector.[23] By the end of the 1990s that system was in the advanced stages of dismantling. [read post]
The Court then reversed the district court’s denial of the State’s renewed JMOL motion on the Penn Central test as well. [read post]
The Court then reversed the district court’s denial of the State’s renewed JMOL motion on the Penn Central test as well. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ Nos. 21A244 and 21A247 _________________ NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, ET AL., APPLICANTS 21A244 v.DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, ET AL. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:30 pm by Peter L. Strauss
Do we really need to be concerned that newspapers and the public misunderstand United States v. [read post]
After the trial, the jury decided that there was an unconstitutional regulatory taking of the plaintiff’s property pursuant to Lucas and Penn Central. [read post]