Search for: "Pennsylvania v. Johnson" Results 61 - 80 of 602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2012, 4:15 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
  Johnson was convicted in Pennsylvania state court as an accomplice and co-conspirator in a murder. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:59 am
Casteel, individually and d/b/a Johnson's Tavern and Casteel Enterprises of Galveston, Inc., both of Galveston, Indiana, unlawfully intercepted and broadcast the "Ultimate Fighting Championship 148: Anderson Silva v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 6:38 am by Howard Friedman
Louisiana Department of Corrections, (5th Cir., July 28, 2017), the 5th Circuit held that prison grooming restrictions which prevent a Rastafarian inmate from wearing dreadlocks violate RLUIPA.In Johnson v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Statler of the Lemoyne, Pennsylvania office of Johnson, Duffie, Stewart & Weidner for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:07 am by Charles Johnson
The Charles Johnson Law Firm has earned an international reputation as one of the top Federal Drug Law Firms. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:16 am by David DePaolo
With all of the racial tension in this country tied to police activity and grand juries waiving indictment of officers blamed for excessive force against blacks, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania overturned a Workers' Compensation Judge's finding of mental injury from a combination of racial and sexist harassment.In Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 8:33 am
Henry Williams, Philadelphia Common Pleas Judges Eugene V. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 2:53 am by Michelle Buhalo
Henry Williams, Philadelphia Common Pleas Judges Eugene V. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
  Justice Ginsberg’s opinion in Johnson doesn’t reject that reasoning, but rejects the result, relying on three prior Supreme Court decisions:     the 1977 decision in Pennsylvania v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 8:19 am
§ 2255 to guideline enhancements resting on the same language held unconstitutionally vague in the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Johnson v. [read post]