Search for: "Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan, Appeal of"
Results 21 - 40
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2016, 6:36 am
This claim fails. . . .Commonwealth v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
The same four-justice majority on appeal rejected as untimely plaintiffs’ claims of voting irregularities (Trump v. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 6:24 pm
The district court granted the employer’s motion for summary judgment on both claims and the employee appealed. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:19 am
Appeals from a trio of separate cases, including the Philadelphia cases Sehl v. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 11:24 am
Bashman, one wise proposal to remedy this precarious situation would be to have appeals from the Superior Court heard by the six Supreme Court justices and a randomly assigned Commonwealth Court judge and vice versa for appeals from the Commonwealth Court. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 3:42 am
Ambrose has been assigned the case. ..News Source.. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 11:04 am
On appeal, however, the California Court of Appeal reversed. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 9:45 pm
Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claim Plan, 686 A.2d 1 (Pa. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:59 pm
" The Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel held that "the evidence preponderates against the Claims Commission’s finding that the smoke inhalation advanced Employee’s pre-existing bulla emphysema. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 10:00 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals in Salomaa v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 8:01 am
Southeastern Pennsylvania Transp. [read post]
3 Nov 2012, 8:44 am
Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution bars certain claims under the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”). [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm
Comment: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has long defied easy analysis when it comes to insurance issues. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:50 pm
In its petition, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania claims the court of appeals erred in granting habeas relief because the court (1) determined only that Pennsylvania courts misapplied state law, as opposed to clearly established federal law; (2) construed accomplice liability in a way that conflicts with Pennsylvania law; and (3) failed to credit evidence favorable to the prosecution and apply the presumption of correctness required by 28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 8:01 am
On appeal, the Third Circuit affirmed the district court decision. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:11 am
Botticella appealed the decision. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
Bankruptcy -- An explicit general release in favor of debtor's principal on behalf of all parties with claims against debtor, contained in confirmed plan of reorganization which was never appealed, is binding on a creditor that had adequate notice of plan terms and opportunity to object where the language of the plan and confirmation order covered the claimIn re: FFS DATA, INC., LIVE DATA GROUP, INC., Debtors. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:43 am
The fact that the three Circuit Judges were unanimous in upholding half of District Judge Bolton’s ruling suggests that at least some of the federal government’s preemption claims have considerable legal weight and may be upheld on appeal, even by a conservative U.S. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 11:24 pm
There was no claim under the FMLA because when plaintiff returned to work after medical leave, the company assigned him equivalent duties without regard to his medical leave. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:32 am
Browning Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, 691 F.2d 1117 (3d.Cir. 1982). [read post]
