Search for: "Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan, Appeal of"
Results 101 - 120
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
In fact, this good faith issue was litigated in the LTL case, but the bankruptcy court rejected this attack.[8] On appeal, the Third Circuit unanimously reversed. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
The South Carolina Supreme Court also held that holdover clauses in invention assignment agreements were not restraints of trade subject to the traditional three-part “rule of reason” standard analyzing the enforceability of non-competes. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
On or about October 22, 2009, Wildearth Guardians filed an amended complaint alleging that EPA Administrator Jackson failed to comply with a mandatory duty to fully or partially approve or disapprove State Implementation Plan (SIP) submissions from the States of Colorado, Montana, New Mexico and Utah within the time frame required by section 110(k)(2) of the Act and asking the court to enter judgment providing: (i) A declaration that EPA has violated and continues to violate the Act by… [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
The South Carolina Supreme Court also held that holdover clauses in invention assignment agreements were not restraints of trade subject to the traditional three-part “rule of reason” standard analyzing the enforceability of non-competes. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
The subpoenas are linked to a long-held GOP claim that federal agencies “targeted” parents. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:02 am
May 6, 2021) the lease manager declined to assign a parking spot closer to her apartment for a woman with respiratory illness. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals in Atlanta (11th Circuit). [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:56 am
During Fall of 2011, one of HITSELBERGER’S supervisors, who was assigned to the JSOTF-GCC, observed and overheard HITSELBERGER discussing SECRET/NOFORN HUMINT classified information at the NSA-Bahrain commissary. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
To the appeals court, a jury could find the employee made good faith efforts and was thus relieved of her duty to provide certification. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 1:55 pm
For instance, you might be targeting SDVOSB set-aside contracts involving VA Medical Center renovations in Central Pennsylvania, or maybe HUBZone set-aside contracts in Salt Lake City. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 1:55 pm
For instance, you might be targeting SDVOSB set-aside contracts involving VA Medical Center renovations in Central Pennsylvania, or maybe HUBZone set-aside contracts in Salt Lake City. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
When random assignments are required, the case will be assigned to a judge within the same judicial district. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:52 am
Does a waiver remain effective after a mistrial or a successful appeal? [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
The Act also makes clear that it excludes the following agreements: (1) non-solicitation agreements concerning customers, vendors, and employees; (2) forfeiture agreements (except for forfeiture for competition agreements); (3) non-disclosure, confidentiality, and invention assignment agreements; (4) non-competes made in connection with a sale of a business where the employee is a significant owner, member, or partner in the entity sold and is receiving significant consideration or benefit… [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
In it, Barlow also echoed the appeals to pride in the new nation that Paine and Webster used. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 23, 2009)Affirming $1.3M JV (minus $90K remittitur) for sales rep on his disability (bipolar)/failure-to-accommodate claim>> Abraham v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
Alexander Smirnov was charged with lying to the FBI when he claimed to have knowledge of corruption by Biden and his son Hunter. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm
” Breyer doesn’t play it too coy, announcing pretty quickly that these requirements “are not consistent with the constitutional standards set forth” in the Court’s 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
Kidwell, 304 U.S. 359, 363, 58 S.Ct. 872, 874, 82 L.Ed. 1399 (1938).* * * Historically, federal sentencing—the function of determining the scope and extent of punishment—never has been thought to be assigned by the Constitution to the exclusive jurisdiction of any one of the three Branches of Government. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Each time, Nunes appealed the decision or attempted to file an amended complaint to restart the case. [read post]
