Search for: "Pennsylvania Plaintiffs" Results 41 - 60 of 8,022
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
More specifically, plaintiffs alleged that Wolf and the Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Health violated their due process rights, the Takings Clause, the Equal Protection Clause and the First Amendment of the Constitution. [read post]
23 May 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   The appellate court also agreed with the Plaintiff’s contention that Pennsylvania was the most appropriate forum for the case and not North Carolina as had been determined by the trial. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 5:43 pm by dhdlaw
Understanding the General Principles In Pennsylvania, a case can be dismissed entirely if the court finds that the plaintiff assumed the risk of injury. [read post]
Additionally, the plaintiffs argued that the Shapiro announcement violated established Pennsylvania voter application procedures. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
.), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that the Superior court erred in remanding a medical malpractice case for a new trial on damages when that decision by the Superior Court went against the “general-verdict rule” previously adopted by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.According to the Opinion, the Plaintiffs pursued this medical malpractice action in connection with injuries the Plaintiff allegedly suffered while in the hospital for knee surgery.At… [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm by Needle Law Firm
The goal of using an expert is to support the claims set forth by the plaintiff (assuming the expert has been retained by the plaintiff). [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 6:40 am by Howard Friedman
Speaker of  the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, (MD PA, April 28, 2017), a Pennsylvania federal district court in a 33-page opinion refused to dismiss on the pleadings an Establishment Clause challenge to the Pennsylvania House of Representatives invocation policy. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 2:12 pm by dhdlaw
Pennsylvania Does Not Cap Compensatory Damages Compensatory damages account for the economic and non-economic losses sustained by the plaintiff, and are intended to “compensate” them for their various injuries — in other words, compensatory damages are intended to put the plaintiff in a position that approximates their status had they not been injured by the defendant. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court reviewed the current status of Limited Tort law in Pennsylvania and affirmed a trial court's denial of a defendant's request for a new trial after a Philadelphia County jury awarded a verdict to a Limited Tort plaintiff.On appeal, the Superior Court noted that the medical evidence presented by the Plaintiff contained references to expert testimony from the Plaintiff's side that the Plaintiff sustained a… [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
 The Plaintiffs filed suit in Philadelphia County on the claims presented and asserted that the Pennsylvania trial court had specific jurisdiction because the financial harm that the Plaintiff allegedly suffered related to the cruise line’s contacts in Pennsylvania, specifically, the company’s solicitation of the Plaintiffs’ business. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 3:00 am by Doug Austin
In this case, a Pennsylvania court agreed to review a plaintiff's Facebook account in order to determine which information is subject to discovery in a case relating to the plaintiff's claim of injury in a motor vehicle accident. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 5:34 am
The PHRA prohibits retaliation for protected activity, like reporting discriminatory harassment.Here's the thing - the plaintiff filed a claim under the Pennsylvania Whistleblower Law (PWL) instead. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:00 am by tortsprof
The Pennsylvania Record reports a Philadelphia jury awarded three women a collective $72.6 million against Pfizer; the plaintiffs alleged that their breast cancer was caused by hormone therapy medications manufactured by Wyeth since acquired by Pfizer. - SBS [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 7:13 am by Victoria VanBuren
PA April 16, 2012), Stephen Brown and Matthew Jury (“plaintiffs”), two employees of Trueblue, a temporary staffing agency, filed a complaint with the district court alleging that Trueblue’s payment system violated the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act, the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Law, and the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
AU has an interview with three of the individual plaintiffs in the case. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 11:46 am by dhdlaw
If you’ve been injured in an accident that was caused by the fault of another, then you may have an actionable claim for damages under Pennsylvania law. [read post]