Search for: "Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Minds" Results 141 - 160 of 180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The “tidal wave” of defamation cases on the internet[3] is matched by “tidal waves” in other areas of electronic communication e.g. child pornography (R v Sharpe [2001] 1 SCR 45 at [166]; see also “Sentencing Offenders convicted of child pornography and child abuse material offences”, JCR Monograph 34, September 2010, p. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am by Kelly
Van Valkenburgh (TTABlog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: An ugly trademark ownership decision: Gemmer v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:57 pm
., me) should support a bishop who has not made up his mind about this issue. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:10 am by Daniel E. Cummins
This lack of a consistent common law on the issue leaves the bar and trial court judges with great uncertainty on the issue.The Initial PreferenceIt has been about five years since the automobile accident litigation landscape was changed by a 2005 state Supreme Court case, Insurance Federation of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
21 May 2010, 6:11 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In the Lawrence County case of Harland v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
– Times-News, April 27, 2010 Feedlot co-owner Cory King and the other defendants charged by the state with more than 20 environmental violations have reached a settlement, defense attorneys announced today. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(EPLAW) District Court of The Hague: Ex parte order based on misleading information: Franz Grimme Landmaschinenfabrik GmbH & Co, KG v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog)   US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany patent transfer strikes again:… [read post]