Search for: "Pennsylvania v. Davis" Results 61 - 80 of 386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2013, 10:50 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In his recent August 15, 2013 decision in the case of Davis. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 4:39 pm by Howard Friedman
Pennsylvania, 591 U.S. ___ (2020)- (dissenting opinion).Espinoza v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
Davis that people have an expectation of privacy in “even one point of cell site location data. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
C.S.A. 5930 in the case of Davis v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:11 am by Kali Borkoski
Our contributors include: Roderick Hills, New York University Carissa Hessick, Arizona State University Kevin Johnson, University California, Davis Larry Joseph, Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund Hope Lewis, Northeastern University Richard Samp, Washington Legal Foundation Ilya Shapiro, Cato Institute Rogers Smith, University of Pennsylvania Peter Spiro, Temple University Margret Stock, University of Alaska, Anchorage & Lane Powell PC Carol Swain, Vanderbilt… [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 5:20 am
Today’s Legal Times updates readers on developments in Young v. [read post]
10 May 2009, 7:18 am
It also dismissed his claim for prospective injunctive relief because he was about to be transferred to a different facility.In Davis v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
We affirm the denial of Malloy‘s motion to suppress under the authority of Davis v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:44 am by Arianna Morseau
Grinnell-Davis, University of Oklahoma School of Social Work Judge William A. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 12:16 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
In an August 20, 2010 Order, without Opinion, in the case of Green v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
   The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has opened a center on its history within the Pennsylvania Judicial Center, in the Capitol Complex (Penn Live).Noah Rosenblum, NYU Law, weighed in on the legal and historical issues in SEC v. [read post]