Search for: "Pennsylvania v. Diaz" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2018, 12:14 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
., of Feasterville, Pennsylvania filed suit in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Defendants, MBK Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Matey’s Restaurant & Bar, of Michigan City, Indiana, Bryan Konieczny, and Mark Kehoskie, both individuals residing in Indiana, infringed its rights in the “UFC 202: Diaz v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:04 am
Schaefers and Diaz case. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [2009]), the Supreme Court held that it violate the right of confrontation for a prosecutor to submit a chemical drug test report without the testimony of a person who performed the test subject to confrontation. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 11:06 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 137998 (SD FL, Aug. 25, 2017), a Florida federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing an inmate's complaint that he was not permitted to keep a chain and cross purchased from a non-approved vendor.In Diaz v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:47 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
(“Joe Hand”), of Feasterville, Pennsylvania, filed suit in the Northern District of Indiana alleging that Defendants, MBK Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Matey’s Restaurant & Bar, of Michigan City, Indiana, Bryan Konieczny, and Mark Kehoskie, both individuals residing in Indiana, infringed its rights in the “UFC 202: Diaz v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:13 am by Andrew Hamm
Nunez-Diaz 19-645Issues: (1) Whether the respondent, Hector Sebastion Nunez-Diaz, is categorically barred from establishing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 12:19 pm
Woodford, 299 F.3d 868 (C.A. 9 2002) ........................................................................... 13 Diaz v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:19 am by Eugene Volokh
The grand jury declined to indict Cobbett, but McKean had required Cobbett to put up a bond, and there were complicated further legal proceedings in Pennsylvania as a result; Wharton in the 1870s seemed to think that McKean's view was legally sound, and indeed in 1909 one Carlo de Fornaro, apparently a prominent cartoonist, was convicted of libel for his harsh criticisms of a prominent Mexican politician, delivered in the course of a general criticism of Mexican leader Porfirio… [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 5:39 am
In 2004, Ira Leesfield and Tom Scolaro tried the matter of Kemp v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:27 pm
  In all autopsy cases, the state's Chief Medical Examiner sends specimens to a private lab based in Pennsylvania. [read post]