Search for: "Pennsylvania v. Griffith" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802    1.814.863.3640 (direct) ||  lcb11@psu.edu   ABSTRACT: When US and  Chinese leaders refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The barrister who acted for Andrew Griffith, the disgraced former MP who was found guilty of raping his wife and unsuccessfully attempted to retain anonymity throughout the family court proceedings (Griffiths v Tickle [2021] EWCA Civ 1882), has been forced to apologise for potentially breaching court rules and section 12 of the Administration of Justice Act 1960, which forbids publication of details of any case involving children heard in private, when he disclosed… [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
On 17 June 2021, Griffiths J handed down judgment in the case of Webb v Jones [2021]  EWHC 1618 (QB). [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Judge Griffith, concurring: But watch out for all these other shenanigans that we're not stopping yet! [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[v] Two examples of these strategic practices emerged following the Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision in the Trulia case[vi] and the Supreme Court’s decision in the Cyan case. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am by INFORRM
Bad Actors: Authenticity, Inauthenticity, Speech and Capitalism, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, Forthcoming. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:51 pm by Peter Margulies
The best indication of the joint dissent’s misunderstanding of the Framers’ scheme is its treatment of Justice Story’s landmark 1820 opinion in a piracy case, United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Vaudreuil of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore on the firm’s California Public Agency Labor & Employment Blog Lesser Known Exemptions: The “Ministerial” Exception to the FLSA - Chicago lawyer Doug Hass of Franczek Radelet on his blog, Wage & Hour Insights Startups and Small Businesses: Picking your Business Team – Pennsylvania attorney Matthew Landis of Russell, Krafft & Gruber on the firm’s Lancaster Law Blog Alabama Seeks To Become 48th State To Enact… [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-0639 (second relist), asks whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – categorically prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with the retroactivity rule set out in Griffith v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
  Here on the Reed Smith side of the blog, three of our core contributors are located in Pennsylvania and California. [read post]