Search for: "Pennsylvania v. Lyles"
Results 21 - 40
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2018, 3:55 am
This is the way the Justices put it in the 1932 decision in Smiley v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 4:21 am
The first was Christie v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 5:49 am
Earlier this week, Constitution Daily contributor Lyle Denniston explained the uniqueness of the Pennsylvania court case. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 3:53 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Patchak v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:38 pm
Whether it can do so is a key issue in the current case, Gill v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 3:07 am
They lost in the Supreme Court in a 5-to-4 decision in 1973 (Gilligan v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 1:30 am
The Court’s 2000 holding in Bush v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am
Commentary on last week’s decision in Universal Health Services v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am
In Puerto Rico v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
Pennsylvania. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 1:30 am
The Court’s 2000 holding in Bush v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:54 am
United States, reversing a Pennsylvania man’s conviction for making threats on Facebook. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 6:42 am
And that’s important because the Terry court acknowledged that in an almost identical case, Lyles v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 3:36 am
That is where the federal Justice Department turned when a Pennsylvania man some five years ago began venting on his Facebook page. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 3:14 am
Yesterday’s oral argument in Elonis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 1:30 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Elonis v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:07 am
Lyle Denniston previewed the case for this blog, while I did the same in Plain English. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 5:25 am
Lyle covered that filing for this blog; Leland Beck also has coverage at his Federal Regulations Advisor. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am
Finally, as Lyle reported yesterday, the Court denied review in Jones v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 4:47 am
Lyle Denniston covered the order for this blog, while Kent Scheidegger discusses the case at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
