Search for: "Pennsylvania v. Small"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,057
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2009, 9:06 am
Markey wrote in Jones v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 12:13 pm
Here, the California class is certified but the Pennsylvania class isn't, a stark reminder of how differently California courts treat material omissions in advertising: Beck-Ellman v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Town of Greece v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:42 pm
" Peter Decherney, an associate professor of film studies at the University of Pennsylvania, makes arguments about film that are similar to what conductor Lawrence Golan, the lead plaintiff in Golan v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 12:05 am
In Kovalev v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:11 pm
Anyone desiring a copy of this decision may contact the Pennsylvania Law Weekly’s Pennsylvania Instant Case Service at 1-800-276-7427 and providing the above-referenced PICS Case Number and paying a small fee. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:05 pm
FDA v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:03 am
Boyko v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 11:33 am
That was the allegation in Lounds v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:23 am
In The Pennsylvania State University v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:23 am
In The Pennsylvania State University v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
The case, Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 6:00 am
Call Instant Case Service at Pennsylvania Law Weekly at 1-800-276-7427 and pay a small fee to secure a copy. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 5:00 am
In his recent decision in the case of Zangenberg v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
In his recent decision in the case of Reilly v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
In his recent decision in the case of Bachman v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 8:14 am
The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania also affirmed the decision. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
In its November 20, 2013 decision in the case of Shaw v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
In its November 20, 2013 decision in the case of Shaw v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 11:09 am
In this veterinary malpractice case, Elvin v Gubert, DVM, No. 326563 and 326566, the Michigan Court of Appeals held that the trial court did not err in calculating damages, instructing the jury, or determining sanctions.Facts: The defendant-veterinarian, Karl Gubert, DVM, performed a castration on Larry Elvin’s horse, a two-year-old Pennsylvania Standardbred named Abundance Star. [read post]
