Search for: "People of Nys v. Kelly"
Results 1 - 20
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2012, 4:47 am
Kelly v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 8:22 am
People v Holmes, 2011 NY Slip Op 8075, 2011 N.Y. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 1:08 pm
See People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:51 pm
” The ruling in Kelly v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:05 am
Employee’s termination after hearing held in absentia annulled for failure to prove the employee was notified of the time and place of the hearingMatter of Toolasprashad v Kelly, 2011 NY Slip Op 00419, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe Toolasprashad decision demonstrates that evidence that the accused individual was properly served with the notice a scheduled disciplinary hearing may become a critical element in the proceeding.Rudranu Toolasprashad was… [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:15 am
Kelly had the misfortune of propinquity, the word used by the Supreme Court in Ybarra v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
Co. v Seck, 82 AD3d at 582; see Chelli v Kelly Group, P.C., 63 AD3d 632 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 4:19 am
Co. v Seck, 82 AD3d at 582; see Chelli v Kelly Group, P.C., 63 AD3d 632 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 5:55 am
Ferguson and Buck v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:34 am
In that capacity, he was trained how to catch people who attempt to use the internet to exploit minors sexually. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 9:49 pm
Kelly, 2010 WL 1685582 [SDNY, Apr. 26, 2010]). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Crawford, P.C., Roosevelt, NY, for petitioner.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (Judith N. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 4:08 am
That makes some people angry. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 1:42 am
People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:23 am
The fact that mode of proceedings errors had been unwaiveable since 1858's Cancemi v People (18 NY 128) did not affect the outcome.Then came People v Agramonte (87 NY2d 765 [1996]), wherein the Court of Appeals said that Webb clarified Coons, and that preservation was required. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Entities subject to the Open Meetings Law and the Freedom of Information LawMatter of Reese v Daines, 2008 NY Slip Op 51879(U), decided on September 15, 2008, Supreme Court, Erie County, Patrick H. [read post]
19 Sep 2006, 10:37 pm
This time Ken, we don't agree with your holding, but we do like your reasoning.In People v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
Horvath, Heller Ehrman LLP, New York, NY Highlights in competitor and consumer lawsuits: Axcan v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:57 am
$25 'skinny' TV packages called a 'ripoff' as industry 'stares down' CRTCOscar Pistorius's murder appeal denied by South Africa's highest court Apple iPhone encryption dispute gets support from Google, FacebookJustice Clarence Thomas Talks; People Listen: Reporter’s Notebook Canada's Premiers agree carbon pricing will be part of national climate change planFacing up to age discrimination - Lawyers Weekly CanadaSex, drugs and dying:… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 10:47 am
I think that's mostly because 2008 had the moratorium due to Baze v. [read post]
