Search for: "People v. Gray (1998)" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm by Donald Thompson
 Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People… [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:00 am
Gray, 202 Ga.App. 241, 414 S.E.2d 265 (1991), cert. denied (1992); Bayshore Company v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am by INFORRM
  This was struck out by Sir Charles Gray ([2009] EWHC 2863 (QB)) and the defendant sought permission to appeal. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Gray goods, or parallel imports of genuine goods, refer to a fact pattern in which someone other that the designated exclusive United States importer buys genuine trademarked goods outside the United States and imports them for sale into the United States in competition with the exclusive United States importer.[4] While the terms, "gray goods" and "parallel imports," are often used interchangeably, opponents of parallel imports prefer to refer… [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 12:43 pm
Back in 1998, in a case called State Street Bank v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 7:30 pm
Today, user-generated content is being created by businesses, professionals, and ordinary people at lightening speed through social media tools such as blogs, wikis, collaborative websites, and a variety of web based products. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:33 pm
Days Inn of America, Inc., 230 Ga.App. 786, 498 S.E.2d 294, cert. denied (1998). [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 2:03 pm by Giles Peaker
Alternatively please see in Gray v Taylor [1998] 1 WLR 1093. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
“Conventional” qualified privilege In Clift v Slough Borough Council [2011] EMLR 13, the Court of Appeal considered how the Human Rights Act 1998 affected a local authority’s defence of qualified privilege in a defamation case. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  In Mills, the plaintiff claimed that, due to a variant gene (“CYP”), she could not metabolize the defendant’s drug as well as most other people. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:22 pm by Howard Knopf
The gray areas may remain resistant to adjudication without being resistant to definition. [read post]