Search for: "People v. Ramirez (1988)"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2016, 6:54 pm
Ramirez has argued that his search was unlawful, and the evidence resulting from the search must be suppressed under the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine, as detailed in People v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 6:54 pm
Ramirez has argued that his search was unlawful, and the evidence resulting from the search must be suppressed under the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine, as detailed in People v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:42 pm
Supreme Court case Riley v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm
From today's dissent from denial of rehearing en banc in Book People, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
Super. 1987); Ramirez v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
E.g., Ramirez v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Cir. 1988) (the “primary cost [of overwarning] is . [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
See People v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
§ 1988. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
"People in an open society do not demand infallibility from their institutions, but it is difficult for them to accept what they are prohibited from observing. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Supp. 151, 156-57 (S.D.N.Y. 1988).Deference to the FDA was the express basis of the decision in Ramirez v. [read post]
