Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Persons)"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2018, 5:00 am
In the case of Maas v. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 7:50 pm
The superior court permitted the People to withdraw a pending petition for revocation of parole that CDCR filed against Escobedo, who was on lifetime parole when he committed his offense. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
Superior Court Argument - 9:00 AM on April 8, 2009. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Benson), no. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 3:34 pm
THE PEOPLE, Petitioner, v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:17 am
Superior Court, 2015 WL 182297 (Cal. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
From a review of the Superior Court’s most recent annual report, from the 2017/2018 year, it is clear that the Superior Court had limited insight into its own operations. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 10:56 am
Superior Court, Cal. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 2:25 pm
The Barney Rule: Pets are Personal Property A 2002 decision by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania decided that pets are personal property in the State of Pennsylvania. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 2:25 pm
The Barney Rule: Pets are Personal Property A 2002 decision by the Superior Court of Pennsylvania decided that pets are personal property in the State of Pennsylvania. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 8:36 am
Reynolds Tobacco Company, the Superior Court of Massachusetts defined what rights a limited personal representative has with regards to a decedent’s estate. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 8:36 am
Reynolds Tobacco Company, the Superior Court of Massachusetts defined what rights a limited personal representative has with regards to a decedent’s estate. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 2:47 pm
People v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 11:01 pm
It's not that long, and it's got a dissent, so you can see the various arguments that a person might make one way or the other.But, according to the majority, what does it take for an "attempt"? [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
In People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Superior Court (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th 214. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:53 pm
The federal government would generally like people to eat whole grains. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 2:27 pm
My sense is that the people at issue are maybe Chaldean, of which there's a fairly substantial community down here. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:44 am
I am delighted to report that on January 21, 2010, the Pennsylvania Superior Court issued an en banc decision in M.A.T. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:44 am
I am delighted to report that on January 21, 2010, the Pennsylvania Superior Court issued an en banc decision in M.A.T. v. [read post]
