Search for: "People v. The Commissioners" Results 1 - 20 of 2,391
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2009, 2:02 am
Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis House of Lords “Crowd control measures adopted by police in order to prevent a breach of public order, which resulted in several thousand people being confined within a police cordon for several hours, did not amount to a violation of the right to liberty if the measures were used [...] [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 2:09 am by traceydennis
Once the election commissioner had made a final order for costs and dealt with all aspects of the petiton under the Representation of the People Act 1983 he did not have the authority to re-open a decision as to costs and consider making an order against a third party. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Yesterday, Commissioner Preston DuFauchard proposed further clarifications to the text of a proposed rule intended to respond to the California Court of Appeal’s decision in People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 11:40 am by rtruman
Woman Says Sex-Change Tax Battle Was Victory for All Transgender People :: TaxProf Blog Summary :: O’Donnabhain v. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:03 am by INFORRM
The area was considered by the First Tier Tribunal in Reactiv Media Limited v The Information Commissioner (Privacy & Electronic Communications Regulations  (2003) [2015] UKFTT 2014_0213 (GRC). [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am by INFORRM
In the case of R (Catt) and R (T) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis ([2015] UKSC 9) a majority of the Supreme Court held that the retention by police of information on the Domestic Extremism Database about a 91 year-old activist’s presence at political protests was (1) in accordance with the law and (2) a proportionate interference with his right to a private life under Article 8(1) of the ECHR. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Spicer v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2019] EWHC 1439 (QB) Warby J held that an article’s headline, however defamatory, must be read in context, with the text of the article, in order to arrive at the natural and ordinary meaning. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 5:44 am by John E. Villafranco
  The Supreme Court handed down its decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:27 am by David Hart QC
Smartsource v Information Commissioner + 19 other parties [2010] UKUT 415 (AAC) 23rd November 2010 – read judgment Ibsen’s Enemy of the People has Dr Stockmann complaining to his Norwegian municipality about contamination of its water supply. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:43 pm by Mark Summerfield
In a development that should surprise nobody – least of all readers of this blog, where I have foreshadowed it twice – on 20 July 2020 the Commissioner of Patents filed an application for leave to appeal the decision in Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited v Commissioner of Patents [2020] FCA 778 to a Full Bench of the Federal Court of Australia. [read post]
25 Nov 2017, 4:10 pm by Mark Summerfield
If anyone thought that the decisions of the Full Federal Court of Australia in Research Affiliates LLC v Commissioner of Patents [2014] FCAFC 150 and Commissioner of Patents v RPL Central Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 177 would clarify the law relating to patent-eligibility of computer-implemented inventions (CIIs), resulting in greater certainty for patent applicants, then the evidence suggests that those people should be sorely disappointed. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:22 am by Geoff Schweller
Further Reading: FINANCE COMMITTEE QUESTIONS FOR THE RECORD Nominee for IRS Commissioner: “You Want to Incentivize People to Report Bad Behavior” The IRS Whistleblower Program is in Even Worse Shape than We Thought More IRS Whistleblower News The post Nominee for IRS Commissioner Calls Whistleblower Program a “Top Priority” appeared first on Whistleblower Network News. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:35 am by Inside Privacy
 The Commissioner-designate responded that “the reform pursues one important objective: to increase the trust of people” including in relation to online transactions. [read post]