Search for: "People Ex Rel. Barrett v. Barrett"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2024, 11:45 am
For one thing, while Justice Barrett shows signs of restraint, Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, in separate concurrences, wax poetic about the virtues and supposed determinacy (relative to all other interpretive methods) of the history-and-tradition approach.Meanwhile it's way too early to pop the cork and celebrate even Justice Barrett's "evolution. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 12:18 pm
The decision, which came out on September 30, 2024, in United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
(BARRETT, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment). [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
Over a century ago, in Ohio ex rel. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:34 am
See also People ex rel. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
1 May 2021, 7:19 am
On the other end of the spectrum there are companies that generate all or almost all of their IAP revenues in a country like Turkey or the UK, be it because the functionality and/or content of their apps is of interest only to customers in those target markets or because they just happened to get more traction there.To sum it up, the effective App Store tax that a developer pays on a particular IAP transaction is the percentage of ex-VAT (and ex-sales-tax) proceeds from users that… [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Co. of Philadelphia v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am
United States ex rel Rigsby, which involves the effect on a lawsuit under the False Claims Act of a violation of the act’s seal requirement. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
24 May 2019, 7:16 am
State ex rel. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:18 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
When the 40-member full admissions committee begins its deliberations, it discusses the relative breakdown of appli- cants by race. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
When the 40-member full admissions committee begins its deliberations, it discusses the relative breakdown of appli- cants by race. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
City of Albuquerque, overturning a grant of summary judgment against a pregnancy discrimination plaintiff; and Barrett v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
You believe you can do the sorts of balancing ex ante that Jeremy Bentham also believed in. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
That case, Texas v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am
Third, Plaintiff alleges that her ex-boyfriend has posted more than 500 images and videos victimizing young women to Defendants’ platforms and other websites, with Defendants’ approval. [read post]
