Search for: "People in Interest of LJ"
Results 1 - 20
of 338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Warby LJ, upholding this aspect of Nicklin J’s first instance judgment, answered emphatically that it is not: “the only question raised by section 3(3) of the 2013 Act is whether the statement complained of indicated the basis of the opinion which it contained [44]. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am
The Registry received sixteen letters or emails of support for the Petition and nine people objected [2]. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:26 pm
The relevant principles, both at common law and under Article 9, had been set out by Munby LJ in Re G (Education Religious Upbringing) [2013] 1 FLR 677 at [20-51]. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
That is because of (a) the extremely serious nature of: the allegation of serial rape of more than three people, the allegation of the rape of Mr Tennent, and the Chase Level 2 meaning that there were reasonable grounds to suspect the Claimant of rape. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm
… The purpose of the law of defamation is to enable a person to obtain a remedy if their reputation has been unjustifiably diminished by a statement published to one or more other people. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
The tribunal found that the section 43(2) exemption was engaged “as both the commercial interests of the BBC and of MTM are affected” and that “there is a real and significant risk of prejudice to the commercial interests” of both. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
Dingemans LJ and Garnham J held that requests for documents by public inquiries were “bound to lead to the inclusion of some irrelevant material”, but that did not make the request unlawful. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
There (at [165]), the judge imagined a scenario where ‘X tells an assembly of people at a meeting that he has evidence that Y has murdered Z, his wife, who has been missing. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
Warby LJ’s three-year term will run from 1 June 2023. 5RB has more information here. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:03 am
Several organisations, including the International Press Institute and Reporters Without Borders, have condemned the costs order for its “chilling effect” on free speech and public interest journalism. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during April 2023 Eleven consistory court judgments were circulated in April concerning: Reordering, extensions and other building works CCVT Exhumation Churchyards and burials Organs This summary also includes CDM Decisions and Safeguarding, Reports from the Independent Reviewer, Privy Council Business, Visitations, and CFCE Determinations, as well as links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 10:29 am
It holds broader potential relevance for other sorts of family court cases where there is an issue about reporting restrictions or publication, given the increasing interest in open justice across the spectrum of the family court’s work. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
The ICO was an “interested party” to the case and previously said the guidance issued by the government regarding the exemption lacked clarity. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm
(LJ)Looking for a Legal Drama to Stream? [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
In a potentially precedent-setting case, 11 directors of global energy company Shell Plc (formerly Royal Dutch Shell Plc) [1] are being sued in their personal capacity over the company’s energy transition strategy. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm
Cotton LJ, at p 94, rejected the notion that something can be a nuisance “because it does harm to some particular trade in the adjoining property, although it would not prejudicially affect any ordinary trade carried on there, and does not interfere with the ordinary enjoyment of life. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
On the same day, judgment was handed down by Warby LJ in the appeal Riley v Sivier [2023] EWCA Civ 71. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
We do not want platforms to be arbiters of truth, but to ask them (or their automated systems) to be judges of the public interest or of the seriousness of offending would be a recipe for guesswork and arbitrariness, even under the guidance of Ofcom. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 1:45 pm
I will leave people to read the judgment for Lewison LJ’s summary of the law of ejectment from the middle ages to the present, ad also of the relation of common law and equity latterly involved. [read post]
