Search for: "People in Interest of LJ"
Results 221 - 240
of 338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am
It is interesting to note that libel reform is not just an issue in this country. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:49 pm
From the latter Sedley LJ in the Court of Appeal is quoted as follows: 27. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:49 pm
From the latter Sedley LJ in the Court of Appeal is quoted as follows: 27. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:49 am
Also on Friday, the Administrative Court (Moses LJ and Singh J) refuse permission to apply for judicial review of a decision of the Leveson Inquiry to refuse “core participant” status to Elaine Decoulos, who has in the past been involved in libel litigation. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
This not only allows a significant extension in freedom of expression, but also accords with the ordinary way in which people typically discuss matters of controversy. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:30 am
The Appellants (some 42,500 people) are citizens of Nigeria and inhabitants of the areas allegedly affected by oil leaks from pipelines and associated infrastructure, that SPDC operates on behalf of an unincorporated joint venture in which numerous participating interests are held, in and around the Niger Delta. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:15 pm
They have a genuine, long term interest in the subject matter. 2. [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:47 am
It isn’t just friendly, inoffensive speech that is protected: Sedley LJ’s statement (in Redmond-Bates v DPP (1999) 163 JP 789 that “freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having” was cited amongst others to this effect. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:19 am
Finally, Beatson J emphasised that “freedom of expression includes the right to say things which “right thinking people” consider dangerous or irresponsible or which shock or disturb” [55], citing numerous authorities in support. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:43 pm
It was suggested that it is better to advise a client to get their marketing people to find a better mark that is available, then waiting around or bringing proceedings. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:46 pm
The claim made by all these people is good. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
Clause 21 would amend s.10 of the Contempt of Court 1981 to provide, in relation to “journalistic sources” (see cl.37(1) & Sch.5, para.1(3) to the Bill), that before requiring a person to disclose, or finding a person guilty of contempt of court for refusing to disclose, the identity of a journalistic source, the court would have to be satisfied not only that such disclosure was necessary in the interests of justice or national security or for the prevention of crime or… [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm
Thus representative actions are based on the commonality of interest between claimants. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
It makes for interesting reading. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
The normal order of things is of course for young people to claim to be older than they really are. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:07 pm
Bingham LJ said, “The problems of defining and limiting a tort of privacy are formidable but the present case strengthens my hope that the review now in progress may prove fruitful. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
The normal order of things is of course for young people to claim to be older than they really are. [read post]
16 May 2021, 4:25 pm
The appeal against the striking out of the defence of public interest was allowed. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:00 am
Bingham LJ said, “The problems of defining and limiting a tort of privacy are formidable but the present case strengthens my hope that the review now in progress may prove fruitful. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
The parties are directly adverse in interests. [read post]
