Search for: "People in Interest of LJ"
Results 101 - 120
of 338
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2022, 1:45 pm
I will leave people to read the judgment for Lewison LJ’s summary of the law of ejectment from the middle ages to the present, ad also of the relation of common law and equity latterly involved. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 11:18 am
Stephenson LJ – The judge was “right to make no difference between confidence and copyright for the purposes of this case” and “The problem before the judge and before this court is how best to resolve, before trial, a conflict of two competing public interests. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm
The court examined Lord Woolf’s class of people from whom “higher standards of conduct can rightly be expected by the public”. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm
Evidence was given at the trial that the VPR would have been circulated to not more than 150 people. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
Where people skim their feeds, draw fast inferences and move on, the law can and should approach the meaning of the words complained of from that “impressionistic” perspective. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
These amount to possibly the most bizarre submissions I've ever come across from mostly ordinarily sensible people. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
These amount to possibly the most bizarre submissions I've ever come across from mostly ordinarily sensible people. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm
He noted that two people who had reacted to the protest made by the Appellants were charged and convicted for their actions. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
As Moses LJ put it “Editors know how to attract the attention and interest of their readers and the courts must defer to their judgement of how best to achieve that result … But non sequitur that it can be left to them to judge whether publication of the impugned details is of public interest. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:06 am
Sometimes it smells, sometimes it is just unpleasant and people many times associate dog food with bad food. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
[This writer salutes the judicial collaboration jointly undertaken by IP-heavyweight Floyd LJ along with Henderson and Peter Jackson LJJ]. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 10:20 pm
It noted in particular: The Council had engaged in a 12 week consultation period in which it had actively sought the views of residents, their families, carers, staff and interest groups. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
Aikens LJ and Simon J, [2014] EWHC 4167 (Admin) described Pham as “a British resident” and dismissed his appeal; the court held at para 91 that in its “view whether the appellant is a British citizen or not makes no difference to his relevant article 6 rights. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
Mr Malivoire disagreed with this, since that group would include people who did not rent cars, and Mr Phillips was not called. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 3:58 pm
One tabloid paper (whose name does not deserve being mentioned here) described the three high court judges as “enemies of the people”. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 4:58 pm
Collectively, with the number of people impacted by the processing, the potential liability of Google was estimated to exceed £3bn. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:35 am
The landowner’s fallback answer, raising the A1P1 point, was more interesting. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
The most interesting area of appeal concerns the right of the Mayor to seek a possession order at all. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
The most interesting area of appeal concerns the right of the Mayor to seek a possession order at all. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am
Certainly the US case law – with its avowed wish to avoid “excessive entanglement” in internal religious affairs – seems to allow for the possibility of (religious) institutional interests being favoured over the individual’s right of access to the court. [read post]
