Search for: "People in Interest of TM"
Results 1 - 20
of 509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2017, 10:05 am
One outgrowth: found evidence of people using US design patent protection to achieve quasi-TM federal rights for logo and other subject matter we’d associate today w/TM. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am
There are some people whose efforts seem to be free to ride on, because of ideas about contract and (presumed) consent. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm
Will also make 2018, when ©s begin to expire, an interesting moment. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:58 am
Once TM covered non-diversion, UC became a slop bucket of ideas about things people were doing that we thought were bad. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 8:15 am
Most people do not experience any side effects from this type of treatment. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am
Be stricter about TM use. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:38 am
Competitive interests need to be looked at throughout the life of the TM/design. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Knocked out on bad faith, which is an interesting place to find an ornamentality objection. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
What are the legitimate interests protected by TM? [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
Sounds less interesting. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
Which raises questions about the appropriate remedy: remedy based on the word Flanax would be a TM remedy.McKenna: but if the remedy against the word comes from (and against) someone who owns TM rights in the word, then it’s a TM back door.Litman: intentional deceptive marketing. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 2:20 pm
Underlying Q of what TM is for. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
(A copyright type interest.) [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 10:31 am
If people are entitled to the fruits of their labor there’s no reason to limit that to expected repeated transactions with existing customers. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
After the TM directive, went to CJEU, which said that a sign always used with a mark could be registered; never asked the question of public interest in leaving phrase free. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Paul Gugliuzza: we first have to figure out what TM’s internal policies are, which is fascinating to a person whose first interests are in patent, which is about invention. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
People may not understand the limits of the right. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
Timberlake thinks only source significance matters; McKenna is worried about other things as well.Discussant: Stacey Dogan: Key motivator for TM is interests D is representing, either individually (justification for own use) or more generally (interest in protecting freedom to use descriptively). [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 7:14 am
” The case that was made to expand TM rights involved the reputational interests and market preemption of mark owners; tied to consumer interests [see Mark's comment below for more on that relation]. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am
Interesting how much we talked about territoriality in various ways here. [read post]
