Search for: "People of Puerto Rico v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 am
Commentary relating to Monday’s decision in Puerto Rico’s debt crisis case comes from Michelle Anderson at Legal Aggregate, while at Text and History Blog David Chen weighs in on the ruling, and Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s concurring opinion, in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
GETTING IT WRONG: Judy Thomas is a good reporter, and she’s interviewed me in the past without prob…
12 Sep 2010, 7:50 pm
State Defense Forces are “other troops,” under Article I sec. 10 and 32 U.S.C. sec. 109, which provides: In addition to its National Guard, if any, a State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, Guam, or the Virgin Islands may, as provided by its laws, organize and maintain defense forces. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
United States, the court held 7-2 that to convict a defendant in U.S. illegally for violating a federal gun-possession law, prosecutors must show that defendant knew he was in the country illegally. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 7:39 am
Puerto Rico, the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 7:39 am
Puerto Rico, the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 8:44 am
Alabama, Puerto Rico v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
Wilkins and United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 8:03 am
Defendant distributes its own Havana Club brand rum, made in Puerto Rico. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am
Autoridad de Energia Electrica de Puerto Rico, 17-951. [read post]
4 May 2021, 4:23 pm
(And even if it had, one can be sure that, as with the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, they would have had no vote and concomitantly little actual influence). [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:55 am
Several localities, including Iowa, Louisiana, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Washington, D.C., have laws forbidding employers from discriminating against employees based on their political party membership. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
The United States represents every citizen, so “everybody” is literally true. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:16 am
” That principle was at stake in Ortiz because the Supreme Court has also recognized (in an 1894 case called United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Working with Jamie Raskin (then a law professor), Rob Richie (of FairVote), and numerous other activists and intellectuals, we drafted several versions of such an amendment -- a simple text as well as others dealing with more knotty matters like ex-felons and Puerto Rico. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 10:47 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Financial Oversight and Management Bd. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am
” In United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
The excellent questions raised show how fertile a field this is for scholars to till.A few years ago, David Congdon, now the Senior Editor at Kansas, told us it was a high priority of his to issue a book on United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
