Search for: "People of the State of California v. Moore" Results 61 - 80 of 221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
In issuing its order, a divided Court noted that the "unique problem presented by this case is that Moore has not asked for a stay. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Affirmative action disputes from Harvard and the University of North Carolina, and a partisan gerrymandering case, Moore v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 1:38 pm
  Most of all, it seemed in doubt about whether it can rule in this case without casting aside some precedents — including, perhaps, a noteworthy 1988 decision  (California v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States Reuters had a piece “Sacha Baron Cohen, Showtime win dismissal of Roy Moore defamation lawsuit”. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 1:37 pm
  So's the fact that the therapist's name in Tarasoff was "Lawrence Moore" whereas here it's proposed to be "Rebecca Scharf". [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
This morning, people in coffee houses and churches across the land will no doubt be talking about the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 6:58 am by Amy Howe
Coverage of yesterday’s grant in Moore v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
Independent Living Center of Southern California, Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
Independent Living Center of Southern California, Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm by Florian Mueller
On the first day after a long Thanksgiving weekend, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied, without stating any particular reasons, a petition filed by Samsung earlier this month for a further rehearing en banc in an Apple v. [read post]