Search for: "People of the State of New York v Monroe"
Results 1 - 20
of 140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2022, 11:11 am
New York v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 10:00 am
Monroe’s image by others, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Milton Green Archives v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 3:38 pm
New York State Dept. of Civil Service, 13 Misc.3d 284 (Sup. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
She stated, "we're letting people in Ontario, Canada define marriage for people who live in New York State. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 5:43 am
Monroe U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 1:34 pm
Remember that if you are in a situation in which federal law is bad, argue that New York State's constitution is more protective of rights and make a state constitutional argument.The good news is that, as pointed out by Jamie Hobbs of the Monroe County Public Defender's Office, the current New York state case law is the opposite from the decision reached by the Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 9:46 am
Monroe Co. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:23 pm
The Court, interpreting People v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:46 am
County of Monroe, which ruled that traditional New York marriage recognition rules would provide for the recognition of same-sex marriages contracted elsewhere. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 10:46 pm
Orange County 8/18/2015)Filed under: Annexation, Current Caselaw - New York [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:26 am
Monroe Community College is a branch of the State University of New York (see, New York Times). [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am
As the Supreme Court stated in Bumper v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 7:16 pm
People v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
The Second Circuit (Newman, Cabranes and Straub) is not buying this nonsense, and it suspects the DA is changing his story because it realizes that a State Court of Appeals ruling (People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 2:34 pm
byJill Paperno, Special Assistant Monroe County Public Defender Although it has been twenty years since the New York Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:12 am
This right "'must be scrupulously protected'"(People v Smith , 87 NY2d 715, 721 [1996], quoting People v Corrigan , 80 NY2d 326, 332 [1992]). [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
For more on prior restraints and subsequent punishments: New York Times Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
For more on prior restraints and subsequent punishments: New York Times Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
2 May 2023, 11:00 pm
”While it has long been New York State law that liability for an attack will not attach unless the animal’s custodian has knowledge of the creature’s “vicious propensities,” in 2020, our state’s highest court ruled in Hewitt v Palmer Veterinary Clinic, P.C. (35 NY3d 541 [2020]), that given their “specialized knowledge,” when people and their furry companions are visiting veterinarians or veterinary… [read post]
