Search for: "People v A. M." Results 181 - 200 of 14,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2020, 3:38 pm
  I'm not sure whether this is a temporal, geographic, or other type of variance. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:11 am
So I'm reading this case, and my eyes flitter to the line that contains the name of counsel for the defendant. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:23 am
 For example, I'm not going to recite the facts that ultimately resulted in a case over which the California Supreme Court ultimately granted review. [read post]
30 May 2014, 11:21 am
I'm not sure why I've seen a rise in the number of cases in which the sentence seems unduly lenient. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 1:46 pm
I'm not going to recite all the facts of this rape conviction, since they're (1) long, and (2) brutal. [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:12 pm
 Which they discover after handcuffing the dude and pulling the thing out.Not what the police were expecting, I'm sure.Unfortunately for Mr. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 3:04 pm
 But I'm not certain that the guy is forever irredeemable.But he gets 50 years in prison. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:40 pm
I'm kinda agreeing with you on that one, Justice Ramirez. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 11:07 am
 Because I can virtually promise you that, on remand, the trial court will find him ineligible for Prop. 36 relief on the ground that his release would pose an unreasonable risk to public safety.Which is what'll happen when you're convicted of (1) smuggling methamphetamine into prison, and (2) attempted murder while serving a life sentence.Now, I could perhaps be wrong.But I bet I'm not. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 1:16 pm
"On the one hand, the crimes are (to me, at least) horrific home invasions -- plus the attempted murder of police officers while evading arrest -- and I'm more than happy for the perpetrators to be incarcerated for a relatively lengthy period of time.On the other hand, the defendant here was simply the getaway driver, and she has already served more than 14 years in prison.Whatchathink? [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 12:24 pm
"  Plus the newspaper has a mug shot and more details about the defendant.I'm not saying anything normative here. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 3:35 pm
  The actual woman who engaged in the sex offenses with the child is sentenced to . . . 10 years of probation.Every little step along the way, I'm sure, seemed just a tiny bit "worse" than the last step. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
I'm fine to let a jury decide.But it is my firm opinion that the relevant people in the Santa Clark County Sheriff's Office belong behind bars.Here's the basic scoop:"The Penal Code authorizes, but does not require, county sheriffs to issue licenses to carry concealed weapons to applicants who are of good moral character, have good cause for a license, reside or work in the county, and have completed a specified course of training. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
  The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced that the Appellate Division just read the statute incorrectly. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]