Search for: "People v Ackerman"
Results 81 - 100
of 182
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2014, 1:01 pm
USGS Open-File Report: 2014-1189 Pesticide trends in major rivers of the United States, 1992-2010 2014, Ryberg, Karen R.; Vecchia, Aldo V.; Gilliom, Robert J.; Martin, Jeffrey D. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 12:00 pm
The anniversaries of Brown v. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 11:30 am
We the People, Vol. 3: The Civil Rights RevolutionBruce Ackerman (2014, Belknap Press) Ackerman, a professor of law and political science at Yale University, focuses on the events and laws that shaped the civil rights era and helped to end Jim Crow, starting with the 1954 Brown v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
Our disagreement – not a small one -- is whether We the People only did great things during the Golden Age before the New Deal. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
For the Symposium on Bruce Ackerman, We The People, Volume Three: The Civil Rights RevolutionThe Symposium raises two large themes, with many variations. [read post]
5 May 2014, 12:12 pm
We the People adopted constitutional changes outside of the procedure stipulated in Article V. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
For the Symposium on Bruce Ackerman, We The People, Volume Three: The Civil Rights Revolution Florence RoismanI’ve already expressed my views on the housing discussion in The Civil Rights Revolution (TCRR). [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
For the Symposium on Bruce Ackerman, We The People, Volume Three: The Civil Rights Revolution Florence RoismanI’ve already expressed my views on the housing discussion in The Civil Rights Revolution (TCRR). [read post]
2 May 2014, 11:26 am
For the Symposium on Bruce Ackerman, We the People, Volume Three: The Civil Rights RevolutionJamal GreeneBruce Ackerman’s We the People series is self-consciously about canon formation. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:19 am
John McGinnis Bruce Ackerman’s We The People, Volume 3: The Civil Rights Revolution is a beautifully written book full of historical interest. [read post]
1 May 2014, 10:48 am
Richard PrimusBruce Ackerman long ago persuaded me that Article V has not been the only route—or even the normal route—to legitimate constitutional change. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm
Mayer at all, and as it did, are significant because Professor Ackerman uses his point that the House would have accepted the Senate version as evidence of “the commitment of the American people to a constructive response to the escalating violence” and says that unanimity wasn’t necessary in Jones v. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 10:16 am
Ackerman argues further that anti-humiliation is the premise behind United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 7:05 am
’” Like Ackerman, Chief Justice Rehnquist excoriated the dissent for “relying upon the now-discredited decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:30 am
New from Harvard University Press: the third volume of Bruce Ackerman's We the People. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 10:00 am
Whether that is a real limit or simply a “rhetorical flourish” probably has more to do with good faith vs. bad faith and rule-of-law v. cynical realism. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 9:14 am
Ready v United/Goedecke Services, Inc., 232 Ill.2d 369 (2008) In Ramirez v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:50 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court denied cert in Cotterman v. [read post]
