Search for: "People v Aitken" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Aitken v DPP ([2015] EWHC 1079 (Admin)) the Divisional Court dismissed a former editor’s appeal against a conviction for publishing a story which breached an anonymity order under section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:33 am by Andrew Hamm
People really have adapted to it and laboratories have found their own solutions. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Supreme Court of Canada had the opportunity to address these questions when it recently released the twin decisions of R v Peers, 2017 SCC 13 and R v Aitkens, 2017 SCC 14. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am by INFORRM
” In Jonathan Aitken v the Guardian (1997 CA) Lord Bingham followed Denning: “An important consideration in favour of a jury arises where, as here, the case involves prominent figures in public life and questions of great national interest. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
The ongoing trial of Christopher Aitken, Martin Hockridge, Djazia Chaib-Eddour, Alexander Peat, and Gary Purnell, who deny using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour with intent to cause harassment, alarm or distress against BBC journalist Nicholas Watt during an anti-lockdown protest is covered by the Press Gazette here and here. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by familoo
Most people appreciate the enormous strains on the MoJ and court service to save money and that the premises in Wells St must be expensive. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Legal Beagle
Speaking at a press conference for the Scottish Government's Cashback for Communities Scheme, Mr MacAskill, who has himself fell foul of the law at a football match after he was held in custody on suspicion of being drunk & disorderly at an England v Scotland football match, was asked if Ms Grahame has his backing and support from the SNP. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]