Search for: "People v Amico"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2007, 1:59 pm
US v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 6:32 pm
Co. of Pittsburgh v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:46 am
In its deliberations, the Grand Jury would examine whether a potential defendant had a reasonable belief that deadly force was necessary to prevent or terminate a burglary, and that inquiry would employ a "reasonableness standard" which has both objective and subjective elements (see People v Wesley, 76 NY2d 555, 559; People v Goetz, 68 NY2d 96, 112). [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 1:25 pm
Lozman v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
Co. v Panetta, 202 AD2d 662; D'Amico v Pennsylvania Millers Mut. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
But some people are more difficult to find than others. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
The former party leaders argued that the change would modernise government records, making it easier and more secure for people to access public services. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:44 am
” D’Amico v. [read post]
