Search for: "People v Appling" Results 1 - 20 of 1,926
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2012, 12:31 am
In Apple v Samsung: the Appeal  I discussed the notice that Apple was ordered to display on its British website and the words that it actually displayed. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 9:30 am by Eric Goldman
Apple More Evidence That IP Law Protects Individual Emoji Depictions–Nirvana v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 4:36 am by Florian Mueller
In the old days, people sometimes bought games because of appealing box designs, but threw them away after an hour or so of playing.If impulse purchases were banned, and with Apple having made it pretty much impossible to make serious money on iOS with in-game advertising, the business model might shift to subscriptions--which Apple would probably even prefer.That said, it definitely is interesting when a federal judge dealing with a case like Epic v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 5:20 pm by Joe Mullin
People started suggesting every idea of what we should do next—make a camera! [read post]
” Law enforcement officials insisted on “backdoor” access, while Apple countered that encryption protects people from cybercrime. [read post]
” Law enforcement officials insisted on “backdoor” access, while Apple countered that encryption protects people from cybercrime. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:13 pm by admin
Guest post by Andrei Mincov (Mincov Law Corporation) And so, round one of Apple v. [read post]