Search for: "People v Ball"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,087
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2007, 10:18 am
Plus, I love the footnote (which I marked with FN above), and to prove the point that even a guilty person might well lie to the police, here's the text of that footnote, in its entirety: "'I love you guys; I always buy tickets to the Policeman's Ball.' 'My brother's a cop.' 'I don't mind being detained because I support everything our police do; they don't pay you enough.'"Hilarious. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
See Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:43 pm
Commentators have treated the Court’s decision in Whitford v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
It ignored the mental health needs of people in ADCRR, spraying them with pepper spray or shooting them with pepper ball guns instead of providing treatment. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 9:19 pm
But legal insiders are busy blaming people for the aborted merger between the two commercial banks. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 2:12 pm
Is it "highly probable" that you're going to pick a blue ball? [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm
However, a forward lateral moves the ball forward in such a way that it is against the rules. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 11:04 am
Since the Supreme Court's 2011 decision in Brown v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:58 pm
However, as the case of Summer J. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 6:49 am
With these three balls you’ve got to lower three pins off a pedestal. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:02 pm
I looked at cases involving the Hartford Whalers, various cases about people hitting each other with hockey sticks, and Jaworski v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 11:40 am
Sure, the market is more volatile, but that’s a risk most people are willing to take. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:19 pm
Well, the California Supreme Court placed Chung v. the People of California on hold pending its decision in Troyer. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 1:02 pm
However, a forward lateral moves the ball forward in such a way that it is against the rules. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 11:52 am
Here's a great case decided by the California Cout of Appeal earlier today that encapsulates both a variety of policy/doctrinal choices as well as exemplifies how not-so-easy being a judge is even you're in fact a "pure umpire" who's merely "calling balls and strikes. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 11:00 pm
Just callin balls and strikes, yup. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 11:58 am
Here's another case -- and there are assuredly many -- that in my mind clearly disproves our Chief Justice's assertion that appellate judges properly merely "call balls and strikes. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 8:01 pm
I looked at cases involving the Hartford Whalers, various cases about people hitting each other with hockey sticks, and Jaworski v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 1:35 pm
The very first Supreme Court victory for LGBT people came about during this period when the court ruled in One, Inc. v. [read post]
