Search for: "People v Barrington" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J gave two examples of the common good: the case concerned a ban on religious advertising in section 10(3) of the Radio and Television Act, 1988 (also here), and Barrington J (at [30]) held that the ban in section 10(3) could be justified either to prevent public unrest, or to ensure that, in matters of sensitivity, rich people “should not be able to buy access to the airwaves to the detriment of their… [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 12:57 pm by Bill Marler
DHHS is asking people to check if they have any of these jerky treats at home and to discard them. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 12:10 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Barrington Now let’s look at what happened in the case of Coppard v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 12:10 am by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Barrington Now let’s look at what happened in the case of Coppard v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 12:36 am
NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal PracticeAllegations in Complaint Made Out Circumstantially Each Element of VTL §1192.4; Dismissal Denied People v. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 9:05 pm
Editing is one thing; what he describes as "taking portions of ready-made recorded material" is another: most would call it theft.(...)By the mid 1990s Barrington-Coupe was presenting other people's work as his wife's as a matter of course. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 6:25 am by Robert Kreisman
  On average each year, 21 people riding in large buses have been killed  in crashes while nearly 8,000 others are injured, according to the NHTSA. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:37 am
How the Case of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:19 pm
Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit, based in Boston, ruled on June 9 in Cook v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:32 am by SHG
There may be no sign over the Chittenden Regional Correctional Facility in Vermont, but for pre-trial detainees, a sign might have read "arbeit macht frei," according to the Second Circuit in McGarry v. [read post]