Search for: "People v Bethea" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2009, 4:22 am
We conclude that there was not 'such a definite, pronounced break in the interrogation that the defendant may be said to have returned, in effect, to the status of one who is not under the influence of questioning'(People v Chapple, 38 NY2d 112, 115; see People v Bethea, 67 NY2d 364, 366; cf. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 8:10 am by Mandelman
Stafne and his colleagues submitted an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in Bain v MERS, which involved challenging foreclosure practices. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Woodford, 395 F.3d 1064 (9thCir. 2005) ..............................................5, 46, 52 Bethea v. [read post]