Search for: "People v Brett" Results 81 - 100 of 937
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am by Helen Alvare
It is fair to say that due to the appointment of Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a great many people — certainly including scholars as well as activists — expected this term to see the Supreme Court begin to move against Roe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
This post originally appeared on the Brett Wilson Media and Communications Law Blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Great coverage of Navtej Singh Jauhar v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:16 pm by Lindsay See
Several weeks later, it denied a similar request involving Nevada’s directive capping religious gatherings at 50 people in Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Sherry F. Colb
He also showed a wicked sense of humor in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am by Edith Roberts
The nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court remains front and center in the news. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 8:39 am by Amy Howe
California and The Sherwin-Williams Co. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 8:57 am by Kent Scheidegger
Justice Black stated the principle perfectly in his concurrence in McGautha v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:49 am
Two people familiar with the investigation said the initial evidence indicates that the man was angry about the leaked draft of an opinion by the Supreme Court signaling that the court is preparing to overturn Roe. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
” This post originally appeared on the Brett Wilson Media Law Blog and is reproduced with permission and thanks [read post]
6 May 2021, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
The CDC says that fully vaccinated people can "[v]isit with other fully vaccinated people indoors without wearing masks or physical distancing. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Crossing to join his four liberal colleagues, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the opinion in yesterday’s Davis v. [read post]