Search for: "People v Case" Results 101 - 120 of 57,269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix
On 12-13 November, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Dyson, Hughes and Hodge) heard the case of Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions, a challenge to the broad power of detention contained in Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
Yikes.Thankfully, Phillong Huynh will be in prison for the rest of his life.But there are presumably more people like him out there.The lesson of this case (amongst others) is to NOT go to bars with strange people who strike up a conversation with you and offer to pay for your drinks, etc. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 10:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
2018 Slip Op 00855 This case was an appeal from the Supreme Court, where the defendant was categorized as a Level Two sex offender. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 8:15 pm by Walter Olson
Columnist George Will cites the Cato Institute amicus brief in Harris v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 9:34 am
  Our discussion of the People v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:24 am by INFORRM
  Judgment in the case of KC v MGN Ltd ([2012] EWHC 483 (QB)) was handed down on 5 March 2012. [read post]
14 May 2017, 1:56 pm by NCC Staff
On May 14, 1973, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Frontiero v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 10:21 am
  Some bluebooking errors; for example, on page 7, the citation to "(Birchfield v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am by Rebecca Griffiths, Olswang
On 17 to 19 January 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes . [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:44 am by CMS
In this post, Luke Arnold, Associate in the Real Estate team at CMS, previews the case of Rakusen v Jepson and Ors, which is due to be heard by the UK Supreme Court on 26 January 2023. [read post]
24 May 2012, 10:19 am by Mike Hamilton
When people consider spoliation sanctions they most likely think of monetary penalties or, in extreme cases, adverse inference rulings. [read post]
24 May 2014, 4:02 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Accordingly, the waiver is unenforceable akin to People v Callahan, People v Malloy, People v Folks, People v Dongo, People v Gladden and People v McCaskell. [read post]
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]