Search for: "People v Castellano" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2015, 1:58 pm by Stephen Bilkis
95 N.Y.2d 368 740 N.E.2d 1075 718 N.Y.S.2d 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant, v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
People v Castellano, 41 AD3d 184, 185; People v Carter, 40 AD3d 1310, 1312). [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 11:19 am by Stephen Bilkis
95 N.Y.2d 368 740 N.E.2d 1075 718 N.Y.S.2d 1 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellant, v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 4:30 am by David DePaolo
The Florida Workers' Advocates and the Workers' Injury Law & Advocacy Group intervened and provided support, asserting a claim for declaratory relief as to the constitutionality of Section 440.11.When Velda abandoned its exclusivity defense, FWA and WILG successfully moved to sever the declaratory relief cause of action from Cortes' suit.Since then the trial judge has issued an order joining the State Attorney General to give the state an opportunity to be heard prior to ruling on… [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:21 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
In a 2016 ruling known as Castellanos v Next Door Company, the Florida Supreme Court said the strict fee caps violated injured workers’ due process rights and authorized judges to award fees outside the fee schedule if adhering to it yielded unreasonable results. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 6:19 am by Jon Gelman
The Florida Supreme Court has Castellanos and the "companion cases" under review. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:50 am by Jon Gelman
 For over two years, the people of Florida workers' compensation have been watching The Florida David Langham is the Deputy Chief Judge of Compensation Claims for the Florida Office of Judges of Compensation Claims and Division of Administrative HearingsSupreme Court waiting for a decision in Castellanos v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by Lucie Olejnikova
Team Members: Michael Chiaramonte (2L), Vittoria Fiorenza (2L), Hanna Shoshany (3L), Victoria Wagnerman (2L) The competition involved a criminal case of People v. [read post]