Search for: "People v Chang"
Results 61 - 80
of 20,116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2020, 11:54 am
It should be fun to watch BP P.L.C. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:23 pm
These views have changed a lot over the past century. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:31 am
People have begun to talk of change. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 1:43 pm
People repeatedly complain about cases being resolved on meaningless "technicalities". [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 8:25 am
Similarly, in People v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 11:57 am
In Thomas v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:32 pm
Finally, he contends that his theft conviction and sentence of three years in prison must be reduced to a misdemeanor based on a change in Penal Code section 487, subdivision (a) before his conviction became final. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:01 am
The court in Sacklow v Betts very recently encountered the issue of a legal name change in NJ for a transgender child. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 8:30 am
," WIREs Climate Change, Early View, 23 Oct. 2022 [open access]Related posts:- OA Week 2022: Theme is "Open for Climate Justice" (24 Oct. 2022)- Thematic Focus: Climate Change & Disasters - Pt. 1 (28 Sept. 2022)- Thematic Focus: Climate Change & Disasters - Pt. 2 (28 Sept. 2022) [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:38 pm
Here's proof that times do change. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 6:03 pm
Here is a guest post in my Bush v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
It makes a nice change to come across a Court of Appeal ancillary relief decision involving people of modest means. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 11:37 am
"Which is, I guess, theoretically true -- once the California Supreme Court decides something, barring its reconsideration of this issue, the only thing left is to ask the Legislature to change the law.But I'm fairly sure that the class of people who drive drunk and kill people don't exactly have awesome lobbyists in the California Legislature. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:56 am
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Russell v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 9:54 am
One of the cases, named Woodpecker et al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 11:15 am
July 2022) [open access] "Filling the Protection Gaps for Climate Change and Disaster-Induced Migrants," Human Rights Brief, vol. 25, no. 2 (2022) [full-text] "Teitiota v New Zealand, Climate Migration and Non-refoulement: A Case Study of Canada’s Obligations under the Charter and the ICCPR," Dalhousie Law Journal, vol. 45, no. 2 (2022) [full-text] Resource: Climate Migration Council [access] - The CMC is "a coalition of government,… [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:52 am
They also said what you currently owned was dangerous and MUST be replaced with a new plan designed by the GOVERNMENT.Those 5 people changed the course of commerce, and in so doing DICTATED what businesses could and could not sell to the public.Those 5 individuals who exercised their power over 100 million people have names. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:20 am
What you are really pleading is "not guilty by reason of insanity," and the People are agreeing. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 5:26 am
Abortion stops a change to a woman's body and completely destroys the body of the unborn child. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
La Rose v. [read post]
