Search for: "People v Clements"
Results 1 - 20
of 274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2021, 3:58 pm
Clements and the victim, who were brother and sister, had been separated during childhood. [read post]
22 May 2018, 10:16 am
As Justice Antonin Scalia – Kagan’s former colleague and Clement’s former boss – famously said to those who disagreed with the Supreme Court’s decision in Bush v. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 10:28 pm
People v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 10:16 am
Clements, the co-founder and general counsel of Free Speech for People and founder of Clements Law Office, LLC. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 12:05 pm
Defendant asked her ex-husband to kill her brother, and he did so. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:11 pm
See Gideon v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 3:32 pm
Chief Justice Marshall, in McCulloch v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 12:17 pm
That's all very understandable.It's nonetheless unfortunate.In the old days -- i.e., several years ago -- there were no pedestrian crossings across the tracks in San Clemente, and people just crossed wherever they wanted. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
Interestingly, he suggested tying this case to the anti-commandeering principle of New York v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 2:53 am
People v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:26 pm
Clement. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:58 am
In AT&T v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:51 am
"Paul Clement and K&S represent the prison inmates seeking release in Brown v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:54 am
Johnson v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:26 pm
"The ScotusWiki file for Connick v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:35 am
McGhee and Wood v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am
[People v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 1:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:50 pm
(Orin Kerr) A few readers have flagged a new district court decision, Clements-Jeffrey v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:39 am
And while some Justices enticed Clement into conceding that a state’s people may act to vary the lawmaking process somewhat, he steadfastly refused to accept that the legislature could be forced entirely to the sideline on the redistricting question. [read post]
