Search for: "People v Crimmins"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2008, 10:17 pm
Further, the prosecutor improperly elicited testimony establishing that defendant had been incarcerated since his arrest (see People v Paul, 229 AD2d 932, 933), as well as testimony on direct examination of the confidential informant that defendant had not made certain exculpatory statements to him while they were in jail following defendant's arrest (see generally People v Collins, 12 AD3d 33, 38-39).It cannot be said that County Court "took appropriate… [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:36 pm
We therefore conclude, based upon the record before us, that " a hearing should be held to promote justice [because] the issues raised by the motion are sufficiently unusual and suggest searching investigation' " (People v Ausserau, 77 AD2d 152, 155, quoting People v Crimmins, 38 NY2d 407, 416; see People v Kearney, 78 AD3d 1329; People v Nicholson, 222 AD2d 1055, 1057). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:20 pm
People v Johnson, 233 AD2d 887, lv denied 89 NY2d 1095). [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:38 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 9:58 am
People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975]). [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 3:42 am
Now there is another split in the circuit courts over the ALJ’s constitutionality that might be heading SCOTUS’s way in the wake of the new decision, Bandimere v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:53 pm
The Court explained "we are mindful of our overriding responsibility' to ensure that the cardinal right of a defendant to a fair trial' is respected in every instance" (People v Wlasiuk, 32 AD3d 674, 675, lv dismissed 7 NY3d 871, quoting People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 238). [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 10:16 pm
V. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 2:54 pm
See People v. [read post]
