Search for: "People v D.A." Results 61 - 80 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2011, 11:06 am by David Lat
And as a result, you don’t want those people on your jury. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 8:09 am
In 1983, a California case (People v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 3:51 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In appropriate circumstances not only is the consent of the D.A. not required under CPL § 170.56 as it is generally required under the more general ACD provisions of CPL § 170.55 but the arrest itself is deemed a nullity based on the cases of People v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 6:33 am
The potential roadblocks -- her involvement in the controversial Ricci v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 4:59 pm
Complying with the Supreme Court's dictates in Brady v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
But even the statements that erroneously said the D.A.'s office was involved are likely don't change the gist of the allegation. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:02 pm by Dr. Douglas Powell
Audits and inspections are never enough: A critique to enhance food safety 30.aug.12 Food Control D.A. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:57 pm
More than 50 years after the Supreme Court struck down "separate but equal" in Brown v. [read post]