Search for: "People v Dawkins"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2012, 5:46 am
Dawkins . [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 1:22 pm
Dawkins sought to retrieve the item but was kicked by Jones, who allegedly kicked and punched Dawkins. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:19 pm
Polk, Linda Tiano, Linda V. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 4:59 pm
If he would haven’t been there, there could have been some innocent people shot…I heard pop, pop; then pop pop pop, all at once. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:07 pm
Accordingly, the criminal court vacates the defendant's plea of guilty and remits the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings, including a hearing to determine whether an independent source exists to support an in-court identification of the defendant by the complainant akin to People v Gethers, People v Dodt, People v Sanchez and People v Dawkins. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:26 am
Chris McGrath v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:14 pm
He likened Google to the owner of a wall on which people chose to inscribe graffiti, for which the owner was not responsible. [read post]
28 May 2010, 3:53 am
This method of handling non-marital down payments on the marital home was explicitly rejected by the South Carolina Supreme Court this January in Dawkins v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:52 am
Very often, tweets can best be categorised as vulgar abuse” rather than statements of fact (cf McGrath & Anor v Dawkins [2012] EWHC B3 (QB) [52]). [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 1:39 am
Subscription Required NEW YORK COUNTY Government Court Finds Rational Inmate's Allegation He Waited To Appeal Denial of FOIL Requests Until After Trial Matter of Dawkins v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:25 am
See People v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm
In terms of precedent, her Honour referred chiefly to Leigh v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 624, [2011] 2 NZLR 148, Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 and Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651. [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:09 pm
An analysis was thereby possible to show the extent of the Twitter activity and that the majority of people posting, commenting or retweeting the libellous material came from England and Wales. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:57 pm
I suppose a lot of people have read The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins recently, but you don’t have to have read or agree with Dawkins to be an atheist and there were lots of atheists before Dawkins wrote that (or any other) book. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:12 am
Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene: what genes “want” to do is replicate. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:36 pm
The EEOC is here to vindicate the rights of people victimized by this sort of misconduct. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:46 am
Unattractive though one might find the association’s enthusiasm for human cloning or their utopian vision of society ordered by intelligence, the fact that the majority of people might be shocked did not warrant the prohibition of expression: it is “precisely in the case of ideas that offend, shock and challenge the established order that freedom of expression is the most precious” (Women On Waves and Others v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm
That case is the recent decision in McGrath v Dawkins, [2012] EWHC B3 (QB) which Lewis discussed in relation to user-generated content (UGC). [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
Because, as Dawkins points out, once again, religion turns out to be the major culprit. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 12:48 am
On 10 and 11 November 2011 the same judge heard a summary disposal application in the case of McGrath v Dawkins and others. [read post]
