Search for: "People v Dawkins"
Results 1 - 20
of 39
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2021, 12:35 pm
Trust and Estate Implications Involving Potentially Incapacitated PersonsS.T. v. 1515 Broad Street, LLC (A-87-18) (081916) Argued November 6, 2019 -- Decided March 9, 2020ALBIN, J., writing for the Court.Only when, through proper legal procedures, a court determines that a litigant lacks the mental capacity to govern her affairs may the litigant be deprived of the right to decide the destiny of her lawsuit. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 1:23 pm
Dawkins, __ N.C. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:41 pm
See also State v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:09 pm
An analysis was thereby possible to show the extent of the Twitter activity and that the majority of people posting, commenting or retweeting the libellous material came from England and Wales. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:52 am
Very often, tweets can best be categorised as vulgar abuse” rather than statements of fact (cf McGrath & Anor v Dawkins [2012] EWHC B3 (QB) [52]). [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm
In terms of precedent, her Honour referred chiefly to Leigh v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 624, [2011] 2 NZLR 148, Phelps v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 130 and Burrows v Knightley (1987) 10 NSWLR 651. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:07 pm
Accordingly, the criminal court vacates the defendant's plea of guilty and remits the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings, including a hearing to determine whether an independent source exists to support an in-court identification of the defendant by the complainant akin to People v Gethers, People v Dodt, People v Sanchez and People v Dawkins. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 1:22 pm
Dawkins sought to retrieve the item but was kicked by Jones, who allegedly kicked and punched Dawkins. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 6:41 am
This is an assertion that (a) is unproven, (b) is deeply suspect (given how much people lie, it is a safe assumption that not only are modern people making logical home economicus choices, but that the human animal has evolved a facility for deception because it is evolutionarily advantageous), (c) even if true does not prove the point that she's trying to prove. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:19 pm
Polk, Linda Tiano, Linda V. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:14 pm
He likened Google to the owner of a wall on which people chose to inscribe graffiti, for which the owner was not responsible. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Dawkins & Ors. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:52 am
Because, as Dawkins points out, once again, religion turns out to be the major culprit. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 4:59 pm
If he would haven’t been there, there could have been some innocent people shot…I heard pop, pop; then pop pop pop, all at once. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:54 pm
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS UKHRB posts Outlawing Dawkins hoax July 21, 2012 Rosalind English Outlawing god? [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:46 am
Unattractive though one might find the association’s enthusiasm for human cloning or their utopian vision of society ordered by intelligence, the fact that the majority of people might be shocked did not warrant the prohibition of expression: it is “precisely in the case of ideas that offend, shock and challenge the established order that freedom of expression is the most precious” (Women On Waves and Others v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am
Most people appreciate the enormous strains on the MoJ and court service to save money and that the premises in Wells St must be expensive. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:00 am
The fact that this reform has taken place may, in itself, give people more confidence in publishing their work. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:46 am
Dawkins . [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:19 pm
That case is the recent decision in McGrath v Dawkins, [2012] EWHC B3 (QB) which Lewis discussed in relation to user-generated content (UGC). [read post]
