Search for: "People v Dogan"
Results 1 - 20
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2011, 1:07 pm
Mazer v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:59 am
Amazon v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
Playing with reality v. paper rights to compromise reflecting different systems. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 11:54 am
Dogan: no apparent constituency. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 4:10 am
The complaint (full text) in Ates v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:16 pm
Southern Snow Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 12:13 pm
Dogan: relative to what? [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 7:51 am
Dogan: how were files allocated to examiners? [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 10:03 am
Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm
Based not on borders for their own sake but for the policy reasons we have those boxes/want people to stay within them. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Versa v. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 7:09 am
Dogan: compare here w/Europe—is the thought process of designers different w/an assumption of robust protection? [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:38 am
Not clear that people often approach design in that way. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:16 am
V. versa. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 5:56 am
PepsiCo, Inc. v. # 1 Wholesale, LLC., 2007 WL 2142294 (N.D. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
He finds First Amendment invocations mystical; prefers the Mastercard v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
Lemley: his instinct is for standards so that they adapt, but he gets that people have different preferences. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:56 pm
Scam opportunities: people think there’s some benefit to paying for a “TM registry. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
This prioritizes property over people. [read post]