Search for: "People v Eady"
Results 1 - 20
of 184
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm
CTB v NGN [2011] EWHC 1232, in which Eady J prevented publication of the name of Ryan Giggs as the premiership footballer who had been in a relationship with Imogen Thomas. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 12:14 pm
He likened Google to the owner of a wall on which people chose to inscribe graffiti, for which the owner was not responsible. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 1:06 am
Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre was a notable critic, accusing Mr Justice Eady in 2008 of “arrogant and amoral judgments” and arguing that “[t]he freedom of the press is far too important to be left to the somewhat desiccated values of a single judge who clearly has an animus against the popular press and the right of people to freedom of expression” Any student of human rights will know that it was not Mr Justice Eady who invented privacy law. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:25 am
MGN LIMITED v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
If so, a HC can be issued. 15.22: James Eadie QC is up. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 5:06 pm
Ames v The Spamhaus Project Ltd [2015] EWHC 127, at [109]). [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am
However, as UK law stands there is no current legal duty on editors to inform people such as Mr Mosley prior to publication. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 12:15 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:07 pm
” Private hearing and anonymity The Judge emphasised that the information in this case plainly concerns sexual activity between two people, taking place in private. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:19 am
Swift v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:11 am
British tabloid newspaper publishing practices are in the news again, following the judgment in yesterday's highly-publicised ruling of Mr Justice Eady in Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm
It was thus too late for an injunction, since it had been viewed by many hundreds of thousands of people. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 6:03 am
Goodwin v UK (1996) 22 EHRR 123. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
On the same day Mr Justice Eady gave judgment in the case of Auladin v Shaikh ([2013] EWHC 157 (QB)). [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
The reason for this request was that, as Eady J himself noted, “it might be thought that my conclusions do not reflect very well on those people”. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
The Court of Appeal’s scepticism of as to Eady J’s approach (determining imputations of fact on the basis of verifiability) has, moreover, been queried by the Supreme Court in Joseph v Spiller [114]. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:55 pm
The Court of Appeal upheld the trial decision of Eady J and the House of Lords refused permission to appeal. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
” 15.57 Eadie QC discusses the possibility of a single line Act of Parliament, which he says created a difficulty for the respondents as it makes no sense in the context where Parliament has put that very question to the people by way of a referendum. [read post]
